New York's Scaffold Law: How Labor Law § 240(1) Protects Injured Construction Workers
New York gives construction workers a protection that exists nowhere else in the country. Labor Law § 240(1) — the Scaffold Law — makes property owners and general contractors absolutely liable for certain gravity-related injuries. Not negligent. Liable. The worker's own carelessness is generally not a defense.
Contractors and insurers have campaigned to repeal or dilute it for decades. It remains the law, and it is the single most valuable statute available to an injured construction worker in this state.
Workers' compensation is not the end of the analysis
If you are hurt on a job site, workers' compensation covers medical treatment and a portion of lost wages, and you generally cannot sue your direct employer. What it does not pay is anything for pain and suffering, and its wage benefits rarely approach an actual income loss.
New York's Labor Law opens a second, parallel track: a third-party lawsuit against parties other than your employer — the property owner, the general contractor, and their agents. That claim can include full economic loss and non-economic damages. Undocumented workers are also protected; immigration status does not bar a Labor Law claim.
Three statutes, three standards of proof
The three statutes, and how they differ
| Statute | Covers | Standard |
|---|---|---|
| § 240(1) — Scaffold Law | Elevation- and gravity-related risks | Absolute (strict) liability; comparative fault is not a defense |
| § 241(6) | Violations of specific Industrial Code rules during construction, excavation, or demolition | Vicarious liability for a concrete Code violation; comparative fault applies |
| § 200 | General duty to provide a safe workplace | Ordinary negligence; requires notice or supervisory control |
What § 240(1) actually requires
The statute — formally titled "Scaffolding and other devices for use of employees" — obligates owners and contractors to furnish scaffolding, hoists, ladders, slings, hangers, blocks, pulleys, braces, irons, and ropes so as to give proper protection to workers engaged in the erection, demolition, repairing, altering, painting, cleaning, or pointing of a building or structure.
Two categories of accident fall within it:
- Falling worker — from a scaffold, ladder, roof edge, unguarded opening, or elevated platform.
- Falling object — an object that falls while being hoisted, or that required securing for the purposes of the undertaking, striking a worker below.
The core question is whether the injury flowed from the application of gravity across an elevation differential, and whether an adequate safety device was absent, defective, or not properly placed. An unsecured ladder that shifts, a scaffold without a guardrail, a harness with no available tie-off point, a load that slips from an improperly rigged hoist — each is a classic § 240(1) case.
Why "absolute liability" matters. In an ordinary negligence case, a jury assigns percentages of fault and reduces the award accordingly. Under § 240(1), where a violation proximately caused the injury, the owner and contractor are liable regardless of whether the worker was also careless. Liability is frequently resolved on summary judgment before trial, leaving only damages.
The limits
- Injuries with no meaningful elevation differential — tripping over debris at ground level is a § 241(6) or § 200 case, not a Scaffold Law case.
- Routine maintenance as distinct from repair, altering, or construction.
- Owner-occupied one- and two-family dwellings, where the homeowner did not direct or control the work.
- Cases where the worker's own conduct was the sole proximate cause — for example, where adequate devices were genuinely available and the worker, for no good reason, chose not to use them. This is a narrow, fact-intensive defense.
Section 241(6) and the Industrial Code
Where the facts do not fit § 240(1), § 241(6) often does. It requires pleading a violation of a specific, concrete provision of the Industrial Code (12 NYCRR Part 23), published by the New York State Department of Labor, rather than a general safety standard. Frequently cited provisions address debris and tripping hazards, slipping hazards, lighting, protection from falling objects, excavation and trench safety, and power tool guarding. Comparative fault applies, but the worker does not have to prove the owner or contractor personally supervised the work.
Federal OSHA construction standards do not create a private right of action in New York, but OSHA citations and inspection reports are valuable evidence of how the site was actually run.
What to do after a construction accident
- Report the injury to your supervisor and get it in writing.
- File the workers' compensation claim — it runs alongside a Labor Law case, not instead of it.
- Photograph the scene, the device, and the elevation before anything is moved. Job sites change within hours.
- Record who was present — general contractor, subcontractors, site safety manager, coworkers.
- Do not give a recorded statement to a site or carrier investigator before speaking with your own attorney.
- Move quickly on records — DOB permits and violations, OSHA reports, daily logs, toolbox-talk sign-in sheets, and site surveillance all get harder to obtain with time.
The three-year personal injury statute of limitations generally applies, but where the site is owned by the City, NYCHA, the School Construction Authority, or another public entity, the 90-day Notice of Claim requirement can control. Verify the owner early. Our construction accident practice handles this investigation from the first week.
This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes, regulations, and case law change, and outcomes depend on facts specific to each case. Consult a licensed New York attorney about your particular situation.
Tell Us What Happened
Free consultation. No fee unless we win. We'll get back to you the same day.